PRACTICE AREA: Corporate Commercial

Digest Of The Week | 58 Cardill Inc. v. Rathcliffe Holdings Limited

Mortgagor retained contractor to build student residence on property — Mortgagee provided mortgage financing to mortgagor in amount of $11,700,000 — When four claims for lien were registered against property, mortgagee delivered notice of default under mortgage — Mortgagee appointed receiver-manager over construction project and property with power to sell property — Receiver sold property for amount of $14,390,000 — Liens were paid and mortgage discharged as part of conveyance of property — Amount of $351,000 was assessed and withheld by mortgagee as additional three-month interest charge that was supplementary to mortgage interest calculated to date of closing — Mortgagor's application for determination that mortgagee was not entitled to additional three-month interest charge was granted

READ MORE »

Digest of the Week | Working for no consideration is not a transfer of property

Taxpayer corporation was incorporated by three lawyers, father and two daughters — Almost decade later, Minister assessed taxpayer for over $2 million and assessment was premised on assumption that father had transferred property worth more than $3 million to taxpayer for little or not consideration — Taxpayer appealed — Appeal allowed — It was found that father was either employed by taxpayer for no salary or worked for taxpayer as volunteer — Father provided services to taxpayer's clients on behalf of taxpayer and fact that he chose to do so for no consideration did not change nature of his relationship with taxpayer — Nothing employee provided to firm could be described as property, because employee provides services, not property — If father and taxpayer had agreed that father would be paid and had father later waived that right, father could have been said to have transferred property, for example, salary receivable, to taxpayer — As it was found that father did not transfer property to taxpayer by working for no consideration, appeal was allowed and assessment was vacated.

READ MORE »

In light of today's announcement that the Cleveland Indians baseball team will remove their "Chief Wahoo" logo from their uniforms in 2019, many news stories are recalling Douglas Cardinal's 2016 application, ultimately rejected, for an interim and interlocutory injunction enjoining the Cleveland Indians Baseball Company, Major League Baseball and Rogers Communications from displaying or broadcasting the "Indians" name and "Chief Wahoo" logo within Canada.

READ MORE »

As of January 17th Legislative Watch will be available as a NEW add-on subscription to LawSource that will allow users to track individual bills or bills relating to specific statutes for deeper, more efficient research.

READ MORE »

The Cutting Unnecessary Red Tape Act, 2017 received Royal Assent on November 15, 2017.

READ MORE »

This digest highlights a recent Court of Appeal decision from Ontario that includes a claim for ad hoc fiduciary duties owed by corporate directors to shareholders.

READ MORE »

This digest highlights a Supreme Court of Canada decision out of Quebec, which may be interesting for franchisors operating in that province.

READ MORE »

Enhanced Text and Annotations Library

The enhanced Text and Annotations Library is coming soon in September on westlaw Canada.

READ MORE »

What’s Market: Legal Trends in Canadian M&A Transactions (2017 Report)

Learn about market practices and trends in Canadian private M&A transactions. View white paper for full survey findings.

READ MORE »

Digest of the Week – Rectification of Contractual Agreement

This digest highlights a Supreme Court of Canada decision which allowed the Attorney General’s appeal from a lower court decision allowing rectification of a contract, holding that rectification was limited to cases where the agreement between the parties was not correctly recorded in the instrument that became the final expression of the agreement.

READ MORE »

Digest of the Week – Receivership Orders Not Subject to Collateral Attack

This digest highlights an Alberta Court of Appeal decision where the Court dismissed an appeal from a summary judgment motion dismissed the action, holding that orders made under receivership proceedings could not be subject to collateral attack.

READ MORE »

Digest of the Week – Oppression Remedy Has No Application to Personal Disputes About Ownership of Assets

This digest highlights a British Columbia Supreme Court decision where the Court dismissed an oppression remedy application, holding that the oppression remedy has no application to personal disputes about ownership of assets.

READ MORE »